Selmo Technology GmbH

We claim nothing
that cannot be checked.

Founded 2019 · Roots back to 1998 · Patented, granted internationally · In use on demanding lines in automotive and beverage filling

This page sells nothing. It says what Selmo exists for, what we hold ourselves to when we write and when we claim, and why we can contribute anything on this subject at all.

01 — The purpose

Eliminate behavioral uncertainty
in industrial machines.

This is not a mission statement for the wall. It is the task from which every decision of this company follows: which service we offer, which we do not, and which sentence is allowed onto a page.

Mission

Behavior gets an object

We give behavior what electrical engineering has long had in the circuit diagram and process engineering in the P&ID: an artifact with normative authority over implementation and runtime. The Behavior Reference (BR) is not after-the-fact documentation of the code. It exists before the code.

Without a reference, “verified” is an opinion.
Vision

Decided instead of judged

An industry in which the question “does the real behavior match the reference?” is answered like a measurement and not like an assessment. The turning point is not visibility but decidability.

WhiteBox does not mean you can see the code. WhiteBox means conformity becomes decidable instead of a matter of judgment.
Values

Evidence instead of assertion

Every statement carries its class openly: definition, structural statement or effect statement. Effect statements carry a condition and a note on measurement. Where something is not decidable, we say so — even when it does not help our case at that moment.

Behavior you can prove.
02 — Why we can speak about this

The method came from plants,
not from slides.

Competence does not show in the number of projects but in what a statement can fail against. So what follows is how the method came about and what about it can be checked.

01
Origin

Out of commissioning

Selmo Technology was founded in 2019; the idea of leading machine behavior through a process model instead of through code goes back to 1998. It comes from commissioning — from the nights in which it turns out that two parties understood the same behavior differently, and no one has a document that decides.

02
Testing

Developed on the object

The method was not published as a concept and tried out afterwards, but the other way round: developed on real lines, corrected there, and only then described as a standard. What could not be checked against a reference did not become part of the method.

03
Openness

Checkable by others

The Selmo Standard is an open set of rules, PLCOpen XML the exchange format. The Behavior Reference (BR) stays in the operator’s ownership and is transferable as an object — including to someone not called Selmo. A method you can only apply with us would not be a method but a dependency.

A passed acceptance test is a snapshot of a sample: it holds for the section that was checked and for the moment it was checked.
What was never observed has not been tested — it simply did not come up. And every later change voids the evidence without anyone noticing. That is the finding this company came out of.
03 — What we hold ourselves to

Six rules
you can measure us against.

They are not here because they sound good. They are in our language rulebook, and every text that leaves this house is checked against them. Where you find a breach, that is a mistake of ours — not small print.

01 — No number without a condition

An effect statement holds project-specifically. It always carries a condition and a note on measurement, never the tone of a definition. Where we name ranges, they come from delivered projects and are re-measured in the assessment on your machine.

02 — No limit left unsaid

Every longer text states what the method does not do. A text without a limit reads like advertising, and advertising is not evidence.

03 — No disparagement

We do not criticize manufacturers, tools, people or previous ways of working. The BlackBox is a missing object, not a missing capability. Whoever attacks their audience has already lost the argument.

04 — No customer name without consent

We name references on request and only with written consent. Until then it reads: in use on demanding lines in automotive and beverage filling. A logo in a band is not evidence but a claim about third parties.

05 — No promise of conformity

Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies from January 2027, with raised requirements for systems with self-evolving behavior. A normative behavior reference provides the material for the evidence — the conformity assessment remains the machine manufacturer’s responsibility.

06 — No term that slips

Verification asks: was it built right? Validation asks: was the right thing built? Derivation is not generation. WhiteBox is not transparency. These distinctions are the method — not its vocabulary.

04 — What you do not get from us

Four things we do not deliver.
So the expectation is right beforehand.

An offer does not become stronger by covering everything. It becomes stronger when its edge is known.

No tool before the reference

WhySelmo Studio is a license, not an entry point. Without a clarified PTF (Process · Technology · Function) and a released Behavior Reference (BR) it only models into the approximate faster.

No accredited certification

WhySelmo qualifications are vendor-issued credentials of Selmo Technology GmbH. They evidence the ability to apply the method — they are not an accredited certification under ISO/IEC 17024.

No taking over your responsibility

WhyWe deliver the object and the evidence against that object. Whether the intended behavior is the right one is your decision — that is exactly what validation is for, and it stays with you.

No replacement for your people

WhyBehavioral knowledge is not outsourced, it is made transferable. Whoever knows the line is still needed — just no longer as the only source.

Two people in conversation in front of a process model
The people

Roles, not résumés.

Selmo delivers in named roles: Behavior Model Engineer, Selmo Studio Engineer, Behavior Defined Machine (BDM) Auditor — a Selmo qualification, not an accredited certification. Each role is tied to a qualification, each qualification to a passed examination. Whoever stands in your project has passed it — and the state of validity is kept traceably.

See the qualifications
05 — Evidence

What can be evidenced today
— and what on request.

Evidence is what someone can check without asking us. Everything else we call an assumption.

Patentedgranted internationally
In useon demanding lines in automotive and beverage filling
Vendor-independentPLCOpen XML as the exchange format, the Behavior Reference (BR) stays transferable
Machinery Regulation from 2027supports the evidence trail; the conformity assessment remains the machine manufacturer’s responsibility

We name references and partners on request and with the consent of those named.

What the method does not do

The Behavior Reference (BR) can only be as good as the intent and the PTF (Process · Technology · Function) it comes from. An unclear intent does not become clear through modeling.

The question we like most

What would we have to show you for you to believe us?

Ask us that question

15–30 minutes. We bring the answer, not the presentation.